|
the Peace Farm |
Advocate
Winter 2006-7 |
|
The newest incarnation So this fall, under the guise of consolidation and the safety of the "aging pits," the Department of Energy began plans for a new. Cold War scale nuclear weapons complex, called "Complex 2030." Through November and December, public "Scoping" hearing were held at the involved sites around the DOE complex. These will be followed next summer by release of a "draft" document and another round of public hearings. Then the final version will be released in the spring 2008, and a "record of decision" will be completed by fall of that year. In the "preferred alternative," which activists have called the "bombplex," Complex 2030 would include production of the Reliable Replacement Warhead, with a new design every five years and production of 100 new weapons each year; a new plutonium pit facility, with capacity of up to 125 new pits each year; faster disassembly of retired weapons; and consolidation of special nuclear materials to fewer sites in the complex and fewer locations within the sites to reduce security concerns. Pantex is one of five sites being considered for the consolidated plutonium work. It is also a likely site for the increased dismantlement work, and for additional high explosives work. |
There is no magic new process for creating plutonium pits, and whatever facility does the work will be likely to look more like Rocky Flats in terms of environmental contamination. There are, of course, safety and environmental concerns with increased disassembly, but there's a safer world at the end of the process. In the larger picture. Complex 2030 will further unravel the weakened Non- Proliferation Treaty, and increase the risks of nuclear proliferation around the world. In simple terms, if we build, others build. If we want to end or slow nuclear proliferation, our own commitment to the responsibility of the nuclear weapons states to dispose of their own arsenals is crucial. Without it, there is no credibility, no "moral high ground." There is also no clear military or strategic need for new warheads. The Reliable Replacement Warhead is "make work" for the weapons labs. A study released near the end of the mhearings indicates that "aging" plutonium is no issue. It is safe and reliable for at least 100 years. Even Congress and the Pentagon recognize there is no "national consensus" of the future of nuclear weapons, and have called for additional studies to evaluate the need for new nukes. The comment period for the scoping process continues until Jan. 17. Though there will be additional opportunities after the draft and final documents have been released, now is the time to demand that the Department of Energy consider another alternative, an alternative which would bring us into compliance with the NPT and move toward finally getting rid of the nuclear arsenal. Enclosed in this letter is a postcard to the appropriate address at DOE. There is space for comments of your own, or you can sign and send it in as is. You can also use is as the basis for a more personal letter, or, by going to the DOE/NNSA website, send in comments by email or fax. It's the best 39 cent investment you can make to stop new nuclear weapons production,, and a great way to begin 2007. |
Send us an email at peacefarm@arn.net